Skip to content

chore: vendor-neutral examples and fixtures - #291

Merged
imran-siddique merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
chore/vendor-neutral
Oct 8, 2026
Merged

imran-siddique merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
chore/vendor-neutral

Conversation

@imran-siddique

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Example identities and illustrative model names in fixtures now use neutral placeholders, so nothing in the examples reads as a recommended custodian or provider. Real integration targets and their package names are unchanged.

  • examples/weight-custody-manifest/manifest.example.json (unsigned, signatures: []) and real_lora_custody.py: custodian, signer, enclave and builder ids are now example-*
  • comply54, otel-genai, langchain, openshell and agentrust-trace-adapters fixtures: example-provider / example-model
  • computeid verifier headers: company names removed
  • noxfile.py: weight-custody-manifest pinned to 0.28.4, matching wcm-integrations-tests.yml

Left as is: the WCM v1 enum values builder-and-opaque-joint and opaque-hosted, which the published WCM schema still requires until 0.31.0, and the signed computeid evidence files.

Tests: nox wcm_integrations goes from 391 passed, 6 failed on main to 397 passed. google_adk_adapter fails on main too (TR-POL-002); the other six sessions pass. comply54 57, WCM demos 13 plus unit tests, computeid 9.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

imran-siddique and others added 4 commits October 8, 2026 09:05
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@imran-siddique
imran-siddique requested review from a team and carloshvp as code owners October 8, 2026 18:31

@Qiang-Xu Qiang-Xu left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good in general, I left a comment about SmolLM, @imran-siddique can you confirm?

---------------------------------
For a closed frontier model the job is secrecy: don't let the weights leak. For
an OPEN-weight model (Llama, Mistral, SmolLM, ...) the base weights are already
an OPEN-weight model (SmolLM or any public checkpoint) the base weights are already

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

SmolLM is from huggingface which is a part of nvidia, are we allowed to mention it?

@imran-siddique
imran-siddique merged commit f10b56d into main Oct 8, 2026
49 checks passed
@imran-siddique
imran-siddique deleted the chore/vendor-neutral branch October 8, 2026 20:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants